All panelists agreed that human rights are a precondition for security development. Subsequently, countries should never choose between development and human rights. Oya Dursun-Ozkanca, Chair of International Studies from Elizabethtown College, emphasized that human rights are a bridge between security and development. Human rights seek inclusive and accountable institutions that belong to people and are linked to a positive peace context.
Vladimir Valdes Garcia, Head of Democratization Department of OSCE Mission to Serbia, commenced the second day of the 2022 Belgrade Security Conference. He reminded the audience of OSCE’s support for the conference since its inception. He conveyed that the quality and relevance of Belgrade Security Conference reflect OSCE’s values and role as the largest regional security organization. He confirmed that OSCE recognizes the link between security and sustainable development and stressed that “lasting security cannot be achieved without sustainable development, democratization and rule of law.”
The first day of the Belgrade Security Conference concluded with a special event: “The Relevance of Vojin Dimitrijevic’s Pioneering Book on Security in International Relations 50 Years Later.” Sonja Tošković, Executive Director of Belgrade Centre for Human Rights, and Filip Ejdus, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Political Science, University of Belgrade, commemorated Vojin Dimitrijević and his contributions to human rights advocacy and international relations.
Thursday’s final panel addressed friction between the Berlin Process and the Open Balkan initiative. Moderator Zoran Nechev, the Head of the Center for EU integration at the Institute for Democracy Societas Civilis, framed the discussion with a simple question: can these two frameworks coexist? Among panelists, three positions emerged. The first position supported the superiority of the Berlin Process. The second approach recommended integrating the two frameworks. The final stance suggested that both frameworks are complementary,
This panel discussed the challenges that the rise of illiberalism within and beyond the EU poses to the EU’s internal and external policies and its very own foundations. The speakers discussed the extent of the pressures that democracies within EU member states and candidate states face by providing examples from Hungary, Poland, Turkey, and Serbia. They also exchanged thoughts on what the EU institutions can do to counter the rise of illiberalism.
Věra Jourová, Vice-President of the European Commission, spoke about the current pressures that democracy, fundamental rights, and rule of law face within the EU and beyond. She highlighted that parliamentary democracies are under attack, as we are witnessing now in Russia’s war against Ukraine. Therefore, at this moment, defending democracy is paramount.
This panel addressed whether the war in Ukraine created opportunities or risks for the EU enlargement process. The invasion has opened a series of new questions in connection with EU enlargement and engagement.
Panellists agreed that Southeast Europe must improve its energy infrastructure and further diversify its energy sources. This comes as a rational next move to improve the region’s political situation through mitigation of energy vulnerability.
H.E. Emanuele Giaufret, Head of Delegation of the EU to Serbia, began by highlighting the suffering and economic hardship generated by attacks on critical Ukrainian energy infrastructure. Giaufret proceeded to emphasize how the current conflict threatens democracy and calls into question the stability of the current international order. Despite these challenges, the war has promoted more unity among the population of EU member states.
The escalation of the war in Ukraine has raised a lot of questions regarding new security challenges across the globe. Discussing the Black Sea Region as a potential boiling point, panelists agreed that there is a need for a common risk-assessment and a long-term defensive collaboration because of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
